Observation Part 2–The People

Desi1

When I first came into the club, there was only one couple there, dancing together in a salsa animation. This same couple remained throughout, however, a solo woman joined them on the dance floor for some time. She started out with an animation of hiphop dancing that looked a little weird with the Indian dance music that was playing, but she shortly switched to Bollywood moves. A couple came into the bar at about the same time she did, walked around the place once, and left.

 

Interestingly, typed conversation occurs regularly in SL; however, there was none in the club the entire time I was there. Much of SL has recently gone to voice communication; perhaps there was discussion taking place on that channel, but there was nothing typed. When I first entered the club, there was an automated private message sent to me to let me know the rules of the establishment. However, there was no personal greeter, which there previously has been in this establishment. There was clearly very little traffic in the club; I’ve been in here at this approximate time before, and there have always been several people around.

 

Desi18

 

Response/Reflections:

 

The couple in the corner did not talk at all as they danced on any channel I could see. Were they embroiled in some private conversation, or were they perhaps just bot characters set to dance in the club indefinitely? Why might a club do that?

 

There has typically been a greeter when I’ve gone to the club before, and there’s never been an automated message. I wonder if the lack of a greeter led to a decline, or vice versa?

 

I’m fascinated at the way that voice communication in SL has the opportunity to affect the world. After all, a person’s voice gives away a great deal about them, detail that people could keep private easily if they were typing. I wonder how prevalent voice communication will become inworld, and how much it will change things?

Observation Part 1–The Surroundings

9/24, 10:10 pm

Online Observation done in Secondlife

Desi5

The observation took place in the Taste of India Mall and Desi Beatz Club in Secondlife, an online community with which I am involved. This is an area I love to visit, since the club has great ethnotechno/world music, and the shops have great clothing, some of it made by a friend of mine. The area has remodeled since I’ve seen it last…and I’m not sure I like the remodel. The club now has a look that combines a Floridian beachfront with Indian art, with a covered pool in the center of the dance floor, clear glass windows looking out towards the horizon, and tiles ringing the edge of the dance floor. Apparently there was just a cricket victory by India, as there are several signs saying “congrats to India and its great cricket team.” There are also a TON of Indian flags hanging in the air. The outlying area, visible through the windows, looks somewhat like Florida to me, with lots of seagulls flying in slow motion, open-fronted stores, and palm trees. There is a great deal of white on the buildings.

Desi20

There is also a large bar in the room, looking a great deal more emphasized and realistic than it did previously. The bar is wooden, with multiple glasses hanging from the racks. In some ways, this bar looks like it belongs in an Irish pub, which looks a little out of place in the tropical setting. Beside the bar, on the other side of the opening, there’s an arrangement of speakers with one large speaker on each side, two smaller speakers within a contained unit, and small lights hanging from above. All I can think is that this is supposed to be a dj booth, but since there’s no dj at the moment, it looks really odd…almost like a salad bar. There are several half-circle seating areas around the dance floor, all arranged with flickering candles and seating animations, so one’s avatar looks realistic while seated. There are assorted blue and pink dance balls scattered around the floor, and a few others hanging from the ceiling. When one touches these, their character is animated in rhythm with the music in some sort of dance style.

Desi15

The surrounding area is a kind of “Little India”, with lots of Indian shops in view, as well as a duplicate of the Taj Mahal. The shops are in a labyrinth layout, with marble walls, mosaics, and fountains contrasting oddly with the seaside atmosphere. There is a wide variety of merchandise available in the shops, with the emphasis on women’s clothing and accessories.

Desi8

However, there are a few other items, including posters of Bollywood stars. There is also a store of shapes and skins for avatars, Ahimsa Shapes. Interestingly, the women’s shapes are advertised as having a “free pussy,” while the men’s shapes are advertised as having a “free penis.” Also interesting is that none of the male shapes are photographed with this attachment.

 

Desi13

 

Reactions and Reflections:

I’ve never seen the club this dead; I wonder what’s prompting it? Is the remodel completely finished? Everything feels a bit jarring, as though pieces aren’t fitting together harmoniously. Could others be having a mixed reaction to this new remodel as well? Thinking about this, I have to wonder exactly what makes architecture and design work in an online environment like this…what do we notice and what do we like? Hm.

While looking around at the shops, I’m struck yet again by the huge role that femininity as visual gender performance has in SL. There seem to be more female avatars inworld, and the gender readability dial is often turned to 11…many of the female avis typically look as “girly” as possible. Also, visual pleasures, particularly those of ornamentation are such a big part of this world. In some ways, things that are typically read as feminine are really dominant in SL.

The shape issue is interesting; the women’s bodies don’t appear to be “edited,” but the penis is left off the naked males. Also, a slang term is used for women’s genitals, but not for men’s. I wonder why this is? Is there some sort of linguistic sexism happening here, and if so, how and why?

Journal Analysis #5: JAC

cover_26_1_2.jpg

Editor: Lynn Worsham

Publication Schedule: Quarterly

Purpose and Scope: JAC, according to their website, “provides a forum for scholars interested in theoretical approaches to the interdisciplinary study of rhetoric, writing, culture, and politics [...with] four book-length issues a year, featuring articles, interviews, essays, review essays, and reviews. ” While this journal did start off as explicitly writing-based, they’ve expanded their scope, as shown by the statement above. Their name change was done for the same reason.

Audience: Subscriptions are included with membership in the Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition (who also publish Composition Forum) so that group’s membership is clearly the main intended audience. However, given the journal’s interdisciplinary nature, a variety of scholars could find it useful.

Subscriptions: Individuals pay $28/yr, unless they are students, who enjoy an $8 discount. This comes with membership in Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition.

BGSU Availability: Print copies from 1995-present are available. We have no BG-specific online availability, but JAC is in the process of making all articles at least four issues back available on their website.

Analysis of Content: I’m somewhat embarassed to admit that I didn’t focus on this journal at first, figuring that it was only writing-focused and therefore not of too much use in most of my research agenda.

Wow, sometimes I’m an idiot.

JAC has an interesting range of articles, with a lot of emphasis clearly placed on both diversity and quality.  Out of all the journals I’ve discussed here, this is the one I know least…but I’ll have to spend some serious time with it in the future to make up for that.

Journal Analysis #4: Rhetoric Society Quarterly

rrsq.jpg

Editor: Gregory Clark

Publication Schedule: Um, quarterly?

Purpose and Scope: RSQ is the journal for the Rhetoric Society of America. The journal covers a wide array of topics in rhetoric, alternating history, pedagogy, theory, and criticism. Submissions are blind reviewed and required to “exhibit high standards of professional scholarship,” per their website.

Audience: Their website explicitly lists students as part of their audience, which I kind of love. Also, rhetoric scholars and teachers at all levels. Their inclusion of events and calls for papers in the field as part of what they look for in submission makes it pretty clear that RSQ is a “working” journal.

Subscriptions: Included with RSA membership, which is $30/yr for students and $70/yr for others.

BGSU Availability: Print copies from 1982-present, online access to 1976-present.

Analysis of Content: Since this is the journal of one of the larger professional associations for rhetoricians, it gets a very good readership…and, in response,  they get a wide range of high-quality submissions from various specializations in the discipline. This is one of the journals here that I recieve, and I know that each new issue always has something interesting in it, even if it’s not exactly about something I’m working on.

Journal Analysis #3: Rhetorica

rh.jpg

Editor: Harvey Yunis

Publication Schedule: Quarterly

Purpose and Scope: Rhetorica is published for the International Society for the History of Rhetoric. It includes, according to their website, “book reviews and bibliographies that examine the theory and practice of rhetoric in all periods and languages and their relationship with poetics, philosophy, religion and law.” The journal is multilingual, but with seemingly the highest concentration of articles being published in English. The focus here is pretty explicitly historical, if not classical.

Audience: Much more focused than some of the other journals on this list, Rhetorica’s audience is made up of the Society’s members and others who are explicitly looking at historical rhetoric.

Subscriptions: Subscription comes with membership in the Society. Individual rates are listed at $46, but students can join for $20.

BGSU Availability: Print copies from 1991-present are available at Jerome Library, while electronic access is limited to 2001-present.

Analysis of Content: Rhetorica is very definitely focused on classical and historical rhetoric. It’s one of the least interdisciplinary journals I’m looking at for this project. So why have I included it? Well, even though classical rhetoric isn’t my area of focus, there are times when modern perspectives on classical rhetoricians have provided key ideas for my work. I’ve read some good things out of this journal, and this is important work, even if I’m not helping with it.

Journal Analysis #2: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society

cover.jpgSigns cover

Editor: Mary Hawkesworth

Publication Schedule: Quarterly

Purpose and Scope: Signs has a lengthy and interesting statement of their Editorial Vision on their website, part of which I’ll excerpt here: “Signs publishes pathbreaking work in interdisciplinary feminist scholarship that challenges the boundaries of knowledge concerning women’s and men’s lives, gender relations, sexualities, raced and gendered practices, institutions, cultural productions, theoretical concepts and frameworks, and understandings of the past and present, as well as possibilities for the future.”

Audience: Very interdisciplinary, particularly in humanities and social sciences.

Subscriptions: Ranging from $26 (student rate) to $52 for one-year print and electronic subscription.

BGSU Availability: Full run available both in print and electronic formats.

Analysis of Content: I love this journal, as it really does have a little of everything. The fact that each journal revolves around a theme enhances its diversity, and the comparative perspectives symposia about specific issues that they often conduct add an interesting element of dialogue to the material. They actively solicit new, offbeat work; this makes them particularly interesting to me for my work, although they seem to be a very selective journal, so I might have to wait a while to get work in.

Journal Analysis #1–Rhetoric Review

Rhet Review Cover

Editor: Theresa Enos

Publication Schedule: Quarterly

Purpose and Scope: As stated on their site, “Rhetoric Review is a scholarly interdisciplinary journal publishing in all areas of rhetoric and writing and providing a professional forum for its readers to consider and discuss current topics and issues. The journal publishes manuscripts that explore the breadth and depth of the discipline, including history, theory, writing, praxis, technical/professional communication, philosophy, rhetorical criticism, cultural studies, multiple literacies, technology, literature, public address, graduate education, and professional issues.”

Audience: Interdisciplinary academic, with some rhetoric interest

Subscriptions: Individual online-only subscriptions are available for $26/yr.

BGSU Availability: Available online 1982 to present, available in hard copy 1982-2000 (in depository) and 2000-present (main periodicals).

Analysis of Content: Rhetoric Review has a nice span of articles, many of which deal with feminist rhetoric and issues of diversity. Their scope does seem to be truly interdisciplinary, with a terrific article about the cultural rhetorics of women’s corsets sharing an issue with an article about Christian Science persuasive rhetoric. Submissions are blind reviewed by a rather impressive array of people in our field.

Research Narrative

As of right now, my research agenda has a definite primary and secondary concern…and each of those are of multiple parts. At least I’m never bored!

            My primary research focus thus far has been on the juncture of material and/or visual rhetoric, craft (particularly needlework), and feminism. I’ve specifically looked at protest knitting, online knitting communities, and needlework as rhetorical practice. I’m very interested in looking at this historically as a form of coded discourse where constraint produced new forms and abilities to comment on the dominant culture. I’m also interested in taking a modern view, looking at the ways these practices are still in play, as well as ways that they’ve changed. Certainly, women in western culture are freer in many ways to speak their minds now than they were a hundred years ago…but what specific things might be gained by using needlework to do so?

            Thus far, I’ve conferenced on this research path, and a book chapter that I’m collaborating on about it has been accepted for publication. I’d like to eventually do my dissertation on this field. I’d like it to be an overview of why craft is rhetorically important that then interrogates specific practices; I truly feel that it is deeply necessary to understand this area for both rhetoricians and feminists, so I’ve got a deep activist zeal for this work.

            The secondary focus that I’ve started to work with has been visual rhetorics of online gender presentation, particularly as it has to do with avatars in Secondlife. Further, I’m particularly curious about the ways that the gender presentation of these avatars relates to the creator’s concepts of real-life sex and gender, particularly in cross-gender gaming. There are some very interesting things to look at here: transgender issues, feminism, the collision of online and real-life identities, and other areas. This is a relatively new interest of mine, but I’d like to keep working in this area. It might merge with the first through the heavy use of craft (particularly clothing design) in Secondlife, but I don’t want to force the areas together.